Skip to main content

Kalvebod Wave and a Lost Opportunity


There's an exciting new development underway on the north side of Copenhagen harbour. A boardwalk extending out into the water, designed by JDS Architects for the City of Copenhagen. The project is called Kalvebod Waves - named after the stretch of harbourfront, Kalvebod Brygge.

When the harbour was decommissioned for commercial traffic over a decade ago, the City was keen to get development going. Unfortunately, they turned a blind eye to the projects that a number of developers proposed. The result is a stretch of waterfront that is so shockingly devoid of architectural creativity and urban spaces for humans that you'd think it was the mid-sixties all over again.

It took a few years but the City realised that they had screwed up and, when a new City Architect took over the job, there was more focus on design and architecture rather than just building in a hurry.

Harbour Architecture in Copenhagen
The only building that is actually interesting is the first one near the bridge Langebro. The Nyredit Building, from 2001, and designed by architects Schmidt Hammer Lassen. The building is in this shot and the fog in this photo conveniently hides the architectural brain farts further down the harbour.

So the Kalvebod Waves is a welcome addition to life on the harbourfront. The north side is the sunniest side - incredibly important in a Nordic city and making the City's first burst of Hurry Up Architecture look even more stupid.

It's all going to be better know. Check out the slideshow on JDS Architects site for all the cool details like integrated kayak parking/docking, etc.

But wait! Hang on. I remember seeing the early visualisations of the project from JDS Architects. I realised last week that something quite brilliant was missing. Something quite important.

Here is the original visualisation:


Do you see it? Top right. Two ramps leading up to Langebro bridge and back down again. Bicycle and pedestrian ramps to provide a much-needed A2B access for bicycle traffic crossing the harbour.

Below you can see the current situation if you are coming along the harbour and want to cross the bridge. It's the green line. Hopelessly inconvenient. The orange lines indicate steep stairways that shorten the journey, but increase the pain-in-the-ass-ness of the route.

The original plans from JDS Architects added a brilliant mobility benefit for many of the 20,000 + bicycle users who use Langebro each day. These ramps where, however, dropped by the City of Copenhagen.

So I asked around. It turns out that the ramps were dropped because they would negatively impact the architectural integrity of the bridge. Which is one of the reasons I've learned caused the exclusion of the ramps.

There has been a bridge connection here since 1690. The current bridge is from 1954. I'm sorry, but if you look at it, it's a butt-ugly bascule bridge.

Langebro 1908 Langebro 1950s Langebro 1975 Hand Horse
It was nice in 1908 but it was butt ugly in the 1950s and still butt ugly in 1975 as well as today.

The only thing of architectural interest is the bridgemaster's tower on the opposite side:
Langebro Boots

So personally I don't buy the blah blah blah architectural integrity whining. Two ramps up to the bridge would add to the aesthetics and, more importantly, it would provide a prioritised bicycle route for thousands of citizens. The bridge doesn't go up much anymore compared to when the harbour was busy. Only 3-4 times a week.

So... enthusastic applause for JDS Architects for the whole Kalvebod Wave project but a twisted nipple to the City of Copenhagen for their mobility FAIL in dropping the bicycle and pedestrian link where it is much needed.


Popular posts from this blog

Bike Helmet Protest in Melbourne

I had a brilliant week in Melbourne as a guest of the State of Design Festival . Loads of interviews and events that all culminated with my keynote speech on the Saturday. There was, however, an event on the Saturday morning - July 26, 2010 - that was extremely interesting to be a part of. A group of citizens, rallied together by filmmaker and bicycle advocate Mike Rubbo , decided to go for a bicycle ride together on Melbourne's new bike share system bikes. A splendid idea. Melbourne's bike share system is shiny new, although unlike most cities in the world with a bike share programme, only 70-odd people are using them each day. In Dublin, by contrast, there are over 30,000 subscribers. Not to mention the cracking successes in Paris, Barcelona, Seville and most of the over 100 cities with such systems. So, a group of people, many of them Copenhagenize.com readers, fancy a bike ride. Sounds lovely enough. They met up at the bike racks at Melbourne University. Hired the bikes wi

Head Protection for Motorists

A while back we posted about an Australian 'motoring helmet' designed to protect motorists' heads in car accidents. It was designed in the late 1980's. Then we recieved this tip yesterday. Another head protection device for motorists, this one developed at the University of Adelaide, in Australia. A serious product for the serious of protecting motorists from the dangers of driving. Despite airbags and seatbelts, motorists are victims of alarming head injury rates. Here's what the Centre for Automotive Safety Research [CASR] in Australia says: The Centre has been evaluating the concept of a protective headband for car occupants. In about 44 percent of cases of occupant head injury, a protective headband, such as the one illustrated, would have provided some benefit. One estimate has put the potential benefit of such a device (in terms of reduced societal Harm) as high as $380 million, compared with $123 million for padding the upper interior of the car. Thi

Fear of Cycling 03 - Helmet Promotion Campaigns

Third installment by sociologist Dave Horton, from Lancaster University, as a guest writer. Dave has written a brilliant assessment of Fear of Cycling in an essay and we're well pleased that he fancies the idea of a collaboration. We'll be presenting Dave's essay in five parts. Fear of Cycling - Helmet Promotion Campaigns - by Dave Horton - Part 03 of 05 Like road safety education, campaigns to promote the wearing of cycle helmets effectively construct cycling as a dangerous practice about which to be fearful. Such campaigns, and calls for legislation to make cycle helmets compulsory, have increased over the last decade. In 2004, a Private Members’ Bill was tabled in the UK Parliament, to make it an offence for adults to allow children under the age of 16 to cycle unless wearing a helmet. Also in 2004, the influential British Medical Association, in a policy turnaround , voted to campaign for helmets to be made compulsory for all cyclists (for comprehensive detail on these