Skip to main content

30 km/h Zones - An Analysis for Sharing

Dublin Rationality
Copenhagen's Lord Mayor, Frank "Le Corbusier" Jensen continues his fight for a car-centric Copenhagen that would make the 1950s proud.

What makes matters worse is that the Robert Moses Fan Club that is the Danish Congestion Commission (Trængselskommission) are also using a time machine to travel back to the congested past at the moment.

A colleague told us very recently that they are seriously discussing widening the motorways leading into Copenhagen because of the traffic jams.

Can you believe that? With all the available knowledge, with all the moves away from motorways around the world, these clowns are tying us to their back bumpers and dragging us into that previous century that exists in their heads.

The subject of 30 km/h zones was brought up at the Congestion Commissions discussions. According to Jens Loft Rasmussen, head of the Danish Cycling Federation (DCF), the room went kind of quiet. Nobody knew quite what to say. In a flash, the proposal was wiped off the table like spilled coffee.

Jens tried to tell them that the DCF had experienced them on a recent study trip to Gothenburg, Sweden. This time, the commission member from the FDM (Denmark's automobile association) stated that one city with 30 km/h zones wasn't enough to consider them.

I told Jens that I would email him some of the content from our Danish 30 km/h group on Facebook - 30 kbh. That led to us here at the Copenhagenize Consulting office deciding to whip up an analysis wherein a great deal of information is gathered into one place. Our environmental engineeer, Pedro Madruga, went to work.

The document we prepared is made public and available for anyone to download. Please use it wherever you can and it is our hope that it will inspire and inform.

The document is on Google Drive at this URL:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4BeITDbI5Mbcm5YbmJhb0RqMnc


If you have any suggestions for additions, please let us know.

If you're in Europe, please also sign up for the 30 km/h zone Citizen's Initiative. It's a long way to 1 million signatures but the journey has begun!

Not surprisingly, Lord Mayor Frank Jensen isn't in the 30 km zone himself. He is in a different league than mayors in other cities.

He said recently, "I think we're the only capital in Europe that accepts that parts of the city centre is a thoroughfare. If we get more cars underground, we'll create more space for bicycles and public transport."

What is scary is that he actually believes this. He obviously hasn't been to Dublin and visited The Quays or to Paris to see the expressway along the Seine, just to name two European capitals.

The difference is that the Mayor of Paris is planning on ripping out the expressway and Dublin is working hard to figure out how to reduce traffic along The Quays. The latter involves a project that Copenhagenize Consulting is working on for the National Transport Authority in Ireland. Not to mention the fact that Dublin has many 30 km/h zones and has banned heavy goods vehicles from the city center.

These cities are not sweeping cars under the rug - they are trying to get rid of them and encourage other forms of transport, and their mayors are leading the way. Sure, our little Nordic capital is expanding our mini-Metro - another ridiculous project worth a few billion that will have a negative effect on cycling levels/public health as well as small businesses on street level by shepherding the masses underground. Simply because the current crop of Danish politicians are afraid of removing the cars from our streets. Instead of doing what the rest of Europe is doing and building tramways down the main arteries, they continue to create space for cars.

Here's a great article about how large infrastructure projects in Australia are failing.

EDIT: We uploaded a newer version on November 22nd (3.20pm GMT+1). If you downloaded before, please do it again. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Overcomplicating Winter Cycling - Why It's Bad

One of the main focuses of this blog has always been on how Copenhagen and other cities have succeeded in increasing cycling levels by approaching the subject using mainstream marketing techniques. Tried and tested marketing that has existed since homo sapiens first started selling or trading stuff to each other. Modern bicycle advocacy, by and large, is flawed. It is firmly inspired by environmentalism which, in turn, is the greatest marketing flop in the history of humankind. Four decades of sub-cultural finger-wagging, guilt trips and preaching have given few results among the general population. When sub-cultural groups start trying to indoctrinate and convert the public, it rarely ever succeeds. For the better part of a century, people all over the planet rode bicycles because they were quick, easy, convenient and enjoyable. In hilly cities. In hot cities. In snowy cities. After the bicycle largely disappeared from the urban landscape because urban planning s...

A Walking Helmet is a Good Helmet

At long last logic prevails. A new campaign has hit the streets of Denmark, thanks to the visionaries at The Danish Road Safety Council [Sikker Trafik] and Trygfonden [an insurance company]. Intense promotion of walking helmets for pedestrians has begun. This logic has been sorely missed. These two organisations have happily promoted bike helmets but pedestrians suffer just as many head injuries, if not more. This Danish campaign poster reads: "A walking helmet is a good helmet" "Traffic safety isn't just for cyclists. The pedestrians of Denmark actually have a higher risk of head injury. The Danish Road Safety Council recommends walking helmets for pedestrians and other good folk in high risk groups." The slogan is catchy in Danish since it kind of rhymes. All in all it's a brilliant project. Let's save some lives. The new walking helmets will be available in the Danish Cyclists Union's [Dansk cyklist forbund] shop. Although, as the...

Driving Kills - Health Warnings

I think it's safe to say that we have a pressing need for marketing cycling positively if we're to encourage people to ride bicycles and begin the transformation of our cities into more liveable places. Instead of scare campaigns about cycling [a life-extending, healthy, sustainable transport form], wouldn't it be more appropriate to begin campaigns about the dangers of automobiles? Many people in car-centric countries no longer regard cars as dangerous. Maybe they realise it, but the car is such an ingrained part of the culture that the perception of danger rarely rises to the surface of peoples consciousness. Sure, there are scare campaigns for cars out there, but what if we just cut to the chase? Much like smoking. Only a couple of decades ago, cigarettes were an integral part of life, whether you smoked or not. That has changed radically. We think that we could borrow freely from the health warnings now found on cigarette packs around the world. In order to be tho...