Skip to main content

Richard's Not-so-Scarry Car Culture

I explore in my most recent TEDx Talk how the paradigm shifted. How our perception of streets changed from being accepted as a human, democratic space for 7000 years to becoming perceived as the sole and exclusive domain of automobiles.

What is clear is that people generally have a problem seeing differently. You can present them with reams and reams of statistics and evidence that cars have a destructive influence on our societies and that there are too many in our cities but you still hear the same last-century perceptions about how things can't be changed and how nothing should change. It's mind-boggling how people will deftly dance around stats like 35,000 deaths a year on the roads of America alone - and 6 million injured annually - and still come out blind to the obvious danger that citizens are exposed to. "Dude... I still want to drive my car".

In cultures that have not been given the benefit of transport choice (Hi, America!) for a couple of generations, such perceptions are sometimes stronger.

I have a pile of books from my own childhood. Among them are a number of books by Richard Scarry. Scarry's influence on childrens books was - and still is - massive. I get all nostalgic when I see his distinct drawings and many of his books were about cities.

I'm not here to out Scarry as a pawn of the automobile industry... :-) but I've noticed a theme in many of his books, when reading them for my kids over the past couple of years.

Look at the illustrations in the graphic at the top. Crazy drivers causing many accidents. All innocent enough. Car crashes portrayed as innocent, oopsy daisy events that are a common occurance in cities. Nobody gets hurt. It's all silly.

Most of the illustrations above are from a 1973 book. It's perfectly okay to use telescopes and magnifying glasses whilst driving. Driving into the harbour is no cause for alarm. Crash into a picnic and you're just an "impossible driver". Cause havoc on the many street of a tiny town and it's all just okay.

There are a couple of bike examples. Cycling while telescoping and failing to ring your bell when cornering on the sidewalk. By and large, however, it is automobiles that Scarry draws most.

I am wondering, however, about the effect on society when books like Scarry's have, for a few generations, portrayed automobile accidents as comical, crazy things. A normal part of life. Nobody gets hurt, silly rabbit.

A culture that sees a distorted view of itself in the mirror of its art and literature will end up pulling a whole lot of wool over its eyes. Do that and you can't see the Bull in Society's China Shop.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

7550 New Bike Parking Spots at Copenhagen Central Station

For all of Copenhagen's badassness as a bicycle city, there remains one thing that the City still completely sucks at. Bicycle parking at train stations. At Copenhagen Central Station there are only about 1000 bike parking spots. Danish State Railways can't even tell us how many spots they have. They're not sure. Even in Basel they have 800+. In Antwerp they have this . Don't even get me started on the Dutch. 12,500 bike parking spots are on the way in some place called Utrecht . Amsterdam has a multi-story bike parking facility, floating bicycle barges round the back and are planning 7000 more spots underwater . Even at the nation's busiest train station, Nørreport, the recent and fancy redesign failed miserably in providing parking that is adequate for the demand . Architects once again failing to respond to actual urban needs. It is time to remedy that. Here is my design for 7550 bike parking spots behind Copenhagen Central Station. Steve C. Montebello i...
Read more

The New Question for 21st Century Cities

It's all so simple if we want it to be. For almost a century we have been asking the same question in our cities. "How many cars can we move down a street?" It's time to change the question. If you ask "How many PEOPLE can we move down a street?", the answer becomes much more modern and visionary. And simple. Oh, and cheaper. Let alone the fact that the model at the top can move 10 times more people down a street than the model at the bottom. When I travel with my Bicycle Urbanism by Design keynote , I often step on the toes of traffic engineers all around the world. Not all of them, however. I am always approached by engineers who are grateful that someone is questioning the unchanged nature of traffic engineering and the unmerited emphasis placed on it. I find it brilliant that individual traffic engineers in six different nations have all said the same thing to me: "We're problem solvers. But we're only ever asked to solve the sam...
Read more

Desire Line Analysis in Copenhagen's City Centre

Continuing in our series of Desire Line Analyses, we decided to cast our critical and curious eyes on yet another Copenhagen intersection, this time where Bremerholm meets Holmens Kanal. We decided to be more specific and focus on one part of the intersection - a location that we know well and one with a specific congestion problem in rush hour. We filmed for one hour from 08:15-09:15. Behaviour vs Design With the massive numbers of bicycle users in the mornings in Copenhagen, bottlenecks occur at a number of locations, particularly where many bicycle users need to turn left. This is something that all of us at the company experience each morning so we decided to study it. It was a November morning and it was party-cloudly, dry and 6 degrees C. The focus was to determine how bicycle users react to the sub-standard design of this location. How they react to having to battle with motorised traffic - something that is unusual in the city. Yep, even in Copenhagen, The Arroganc...
Read more